Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Miles Newlyn's avatar

Hi Tom,

interesting read, thanks.

I'm not a good writer so I'll stick to some bullet points here:

• You never know when you've done your best work, 'quitting while you're on top' is (to me) simply fear of failure. The dread of not being able to please people again.

• Your greatest piece of work may be your last - you don't know.

• To consider one's legacy is to let the ego indulge in self-importance. A single good piece of work is enough of a legacy, what's important is the work, not what people think of you when you're gone. If a person builds a bridge over a river where it's needed, that's amazing. It doesn't matter if all the other things they built after the bridge were just walls, we still need walls.

• An artists' early work is most often their purest, most unique work. A product of the forming personality and ego. It may be great, but it can be inaccessible to a wider audience. The mellowing of the personality with age, the humility that experience can bring gives later work a broader reach. Genius is diminished, that's true, but understanding that your creativity doesn't need to be about yourself is good for mankind's legacy.

•What matters is the life you're living, don't worry about your obituary, you're not going to read it. A life for a few lines about some good stuff you did when you were young? Written for an abstract and possibly non-existent audience? Not worth it.

Expand full comment
edward torpy's avatar

It would be difficult to gain just the right amount of fame that your work is widely recognised while avoiding fame from overflowing and destroying your privacy.

Bill obviously did a great job of balancing fame, I had no idea who he was when I started reading this post, but I can say that I knew of Calvin and Hobbes.

I find it interesting that another cartoonist decided to do the opposite. Dilbert is a wildly successful comic that's been running for many years. Scott Adams could have easily copied Bill Waterson's plan, avoided fame and enjoyed his fortune. Instead Scott has continually published more comics and books. And he is very public about his political opinions.

I guess for some personalities a large amount of fame would be enjoyable.

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts